Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is much better than LG Stylo 6, having a overall score of 84.9 against 76.7. The Galaxy A80 design has the same weight than the LG Stylo 6, but it's a bit thicker. Galaxy A80 and LG Stylo 6 count with very similar processors, and although the LG Stylo 6 has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG Stylo 6 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy A80 counts with a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a way better (4K) video quality and a lot bigger sensor.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.