Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 84.9 score against 81.2. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A80 is an extremely heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the LG V40 ThinQ. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A80, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V40 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A80 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a lot smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A80 has just a bit longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.