Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A80, having an 87.6 score against 84.9. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer phone, and it is also a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A80. LG V60 ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A80. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A80, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a little bit greater display density and a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution, a way worse (4K) video definition, a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors and a tinier aperture.
The LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A80, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.