Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-09-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Glacier |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is a little bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo's global score of 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy A80 body is lighter than Microsoft Surface Duo, but it is incredibly thicker and was released just a bit over a year before. Microsoft Surface Duo has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A80, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Microsoft Surface Duo features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a better 1800 x 2700px resolution and a bigger screen. The Microsoft Surface Duo features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Galaxy A80, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A80 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a very superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.