Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a overall score of 84.9 against 81.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it must be told that it's also incredibly older, somewhat thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel count in each inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1256 x 2760. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a back-facing camera with a better resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A80, because it has more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.