Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than Moto G 5G, having an 84.9 score against 81.5. Although Galaxy A80 is older and a little bit heavier than the Moto G 5G, it's design is still just a bit thinner. The Galaxy A80 has a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A80 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Moto G 5G features a screen that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A80 one, they have a screen with the same size, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixels number in each inch of display. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 MP resolution, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Moto G 5G has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 35% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.