Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having a overall score of 84.9 against 82.6. Despite being the best we are comparing, we must note that it's also older, just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy A80, and although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto G 5G Plus has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same size screen, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a just a little greater display density. Moto G 5G Plus features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rates, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 35% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.