Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A80 body is just a little thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, but it is a little heavier and was released just 11 months before. Moto G Power has a display that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A80's display, because although the Moto G Power has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2300 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels count per inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A80 counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A80 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Moto G Power counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A80 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.