Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is a bit better than the Moto G41's 79.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy A80 is a incredibly older, heavier and thicker device than the Moto G41. The Moto G41 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Moto G41 also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
Moto G41 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G41 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G41 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Galaxy A80 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G41, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.