Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having an 84.9 score against 75.8. Galaxy A80's body is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it's way heavier and incredibly thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels count per screen inch.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A80 features a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM and a greater number of 2200 MHz cores. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a little longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.