Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-05-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 84.9 against 77.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A80 is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's a lot thicker and much heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A80 captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A80 also has a way larger sensor and a back camera with way more mega pixels. The Galaxy A80 counts with a way better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.