Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. Galaxy A80's construction is newer, but extremely thicker and notably heavier than the Moto Z3. Motorola Moto Z3 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z3 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A80, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F2 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a much more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.