Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's general score of 76.3. Galaxy A80's construction is newer than Moto Z3 Play's, but it is extremely thicker and much heavier. The Galaxy A80 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A80 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play and Samsung Galaxy A80 count with similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy A80 takes better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A80 has greater battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.