Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a bit better than the Motorola One Action, having a score of 84.9 against 78.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A80 is a better device than the Motorola One Action, we must note that it's also somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. Motorola One Action counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
Motorola One Action features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.