Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier device than Nokia 9 PureView. The Nokia 9 PureView has a little better performance than Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. Nokia 9 PureView features as much memory to store more games and applications as the Galaxy A80 one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A80 features a bit better battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3320mAh. The Galaxy A80 captures better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.