Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A80 body is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, and they were released with only 5 months difference. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little sharper display than Galaxy A80, although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a screen with the same size. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same size sensor and a same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.