Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A80's overall score of 84.9. The Galaxy S10 body is noticeably lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A80, although both of them were released only 3 months apart. The Galaxy S10 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a greater screen density.
Galaxy S10 has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A80. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Galaxy S10 has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy S10 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A80 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.