Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A80, having a general score of 98 against 84.9. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer and a bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A80, although it is a little heavier. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better display than Galaxy A80, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger aperture, a way higher video definition and a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.