Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-05-29 | -- |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's overall score of 80.9. Galaxy S6 Active features a little faster processor than Galaxy A80, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a GPU.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a greater camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a way larger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.