Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-05-29 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with an 84.9 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A80's body is notably newer and just a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy A80 has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.