Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a bit better than Galaxy S9, getting an 84.9 score against 83.3. The Galaxy A80 is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy S9, although it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Galaxy S9 counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy S9 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A80 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a way smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos and a lot more megapixels camera.
The Galaxy A80 counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.