Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| 2019-05-29 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZs, having an 84.9 score against 77.2. Even though the Galaxy A80 is newer than the Sony Xperia XZs, it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features just a bit better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZs features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch. The Galaxy A80 has a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Sony Xperia XZs shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a lot less mega-pixels camera, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a tinier sensor, they both have a F2 diafragm aperture. Galaxy A80 features greater battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 28% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.