Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a general score of 84.9 against 78.3. The Galaxy A80 design is older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo X70 Pro. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density.
Vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels, higher video frame rate, a bigger aperture and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X70 Pro features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.