Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 score. Even being the best cellphone in this review, Galaxy A80's body is somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit better processor than Galaxy A80. They have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A80 features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A80 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.