Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-02-22 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, getting an 84.9 score against 75.8. Even though Galaxy A80 is newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features a screen that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A80, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A80 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A80 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations and a way higher video resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.