Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, having a overall score of 84.9 against 77.2. Galaxy A80's body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. The Galaxy A80 has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A80 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a little bit better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels amount in each inch of screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has an 8 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy A80 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photos, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.