Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting an 84.9 score against 76.6. Although it's the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A80 is an older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Samsung Galaxy A80 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 count with similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A80 has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A80 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A80 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size, the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same resolution camera in the back and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.