Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 general score. The Galaxy A80 is an older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's processing unit is just as good as the Galaxy A80 one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a display that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A80 one, both of them have a same size screen, an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the same sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features better battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.