Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with an 84.9 score against 83. Even being the best in this review, Samsung Galaxy A80 is an older, a little heavier and a little thicker phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has superior battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, a back-facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.