Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-11-15 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2018), getting an 86.6 score against 85.2. IPhone SE (2022) is a much newer phone, and it is also extremely lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A9 (2018). The iPhone SE (2022) has a faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has 2 less processing cores and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), although it has a way smaller display, a way worse 750 x 1334 pixels resolution and a just a little worse display density. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) captures clearer photographs and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments and a lot higher 24 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 3800mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.