Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Mystic indigo |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a bit better than Moto G Stylus, with a general score of 85.2 against 79.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is older than the Moto G Stylus, it's body is thinner and a bit lighter. The Galaxy A9 (2018) and the Moto G Stylus have similar screens, although the Moto G Stylus also has a little bigger display, a quite better 1080 x 2300 resolution and a little bit better screen pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to Galaxy A9 (2018)'s one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.