Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a general score of 85.2 against 79.9. Galaxy A9 (2018) is an much older phone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it just a little thinner and just a bit lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution, a greater screen density and a quite larger display. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit more memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 18% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.