Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 392 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32's overall score of 84.7. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is an way older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A32, but it's lighter and thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2220px.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a little bit better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A32 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has improved battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.