Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a much older and notably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it lighter anyway. Galaxy A9 (2018) features a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite better quantity of pixels in each screen inch, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.