Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. Galaxy A9 (2018) is a older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker phone than the vivo X60 Pro. The vivo X60 Pro features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a just a little higher pixels density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels, better video frame rate and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.