Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a overall score of 90.5 against 74.4. Galaxy A90 5G is a noticeably newer and just a bit lighter phone than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it is also a little thicker. Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite larger display. Galaxy A90 5G has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a way larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.