Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is extremely newer and extremely thinner, but also just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a lot bigger display. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot larger sensor, a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.