Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than the LG Velvet, with a 90.5 score against 87.1. Despite being the best we are comparing here, it must be noted that it's also heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better CPU than LG Velvet. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
LG Velvet features a display that's just as good as Galaxy A90 5G's screen, although the LG Velvet also has a just a little greater display pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than LG Velvet, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size back camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 48 MP.
LG Velvet has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.