Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a overall score of 90.5 against 81.9. Galaxy A90 5G is a much older, just a bit thicker and heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 OS.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a bit more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot bigger sensor, a larger aperture to take better images in low light environments and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.