Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a global score of 90.5 against 87.1. Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 operating system. The Galaxy A90 5G body is just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it is just a little heavier and was released 5 years before.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A90 5G. Both have a same size screen, the same quantity of pixels per inch of display and exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery lifetime is very similar to the Galaxy A90 5G one. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.