Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Smoke black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting a overall score of 90.5 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while Motorola Moto G Power counts with Android 11 operating system. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and the Motorola Moto G Power were released with only 8 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is thinner but just a little heavier.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A90 5G features just a bit better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a way better resolution camera.
Moto G Power features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.