Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than the Moto G200 5G, having a 90.5 score against 86.2. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a way older and a bit heavier cellphone than Moto G200 5G, but Samsung could make it just a bit thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, and Moto G200 5G has Android 11 operating system.
Moto G200 5G has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a screen that's very similar to the Galaxy A90 5G one, although the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460, a quite greater pixel density and a bit larger screen.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a bigger aperture and a camera with a much higher resolution. The Galaxy A90 5G has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G200 5G has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.