Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-04 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Moto Z Force, having a 90.5 score against 75.8. The Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, and Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat OS. Galaxy A90 5G's construction is extremely newer than Moto Z Force's, but it is thicker and noticeably heavier.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto Z Force counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G counts with greater battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 29 percent more battery size. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.