Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher display pixel density. The Galaxy A90 5G has a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A90 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.