Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Motorola Moto Z3, getting a 90.5 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z3, but it's extremely heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, and Motorola Moto Z3 works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and the Motorola Moto Z3 both have similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a little smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a bit better pixels number in each inch in the display. Moto Z3 features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G has a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F2 aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.