Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Moto Z3 Play, having a general score of 90.5 against 76.3. Although the Galaxy A90 5G is newer than the Moto Z3 Play, it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a slightly better display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
The Moto Z3 Play features a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.