Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than the Motorola One Action's general score of 78.5. Even though the Galaxy A90 5G and Motorola One Action were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy A90 5G's design is heavier but also a little thinner than Motorola One Action.
The Motorola One Action features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px. The Motorola One Action has a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features improved battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.