Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber shade |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with a score of 90.5 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while nubia Red Magic 3S works with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's construction is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both of them were only released 1 months apart.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a display that's just as good as Galaxy A90 5G's screen, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, they both have a screen of the same size.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a 48 megapixels camera and a same size sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger aperture and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.