Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy A50, with a overall score of 90.5 against 83.8. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, it must be told that it's also just a bit thicker and heavier. Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A90 5G feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Galaxy A90 5G one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% more battery capacity. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality, a much larger back camera sensor and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.