Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, getting a overall score of 90.5 against 88.1. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, and Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy A90 5G is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy F62, but it is just a little lighter and thinner anyway.
The Galaxy F62 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G. They have a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch, a screen of the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 4 more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with slightly more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy F62 features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.